Doubles
|
01-07-2007, 01:23 PM,
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Doubles
I agree, for a smaller set of doubles, which will give you the most flexibility, go with the LP Steel 85s.
The aluminum 65s (or actually I think they're called 63s) are way too stumpy. Unless you are really short, I think they would trim you out poorly. - Kirk |
|||
01-07-2007, 07:40 PM,
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Doubles
Okay, advice taken. I'll try the 85's or close equivalent in steel. Thanks for the offer of trying the 85's Lonnie I'll let you know. Linda
If there are no dogs in heaven, then when I die I want to go where they are--Will Rogers
|
|||
01-08-2007, 03:02 PM,
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Doubles
Linda,
Lonnie is on it...you need prbably at least 85's because other divers will be planning their dives based on the lowest "thirds" available. For the Kamloops, I would ask around to see what the minimum doubles size is reasonable for teh dive before buying a set. You can use my doubles on the 21st if we all get there.
Dan L
|
|||
01-09-2007, 11:55 AM,
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Doubles
85's ...
85's ... 85's ... ;D ;D ;D Jeano Beano
How's my diving? Call 1-800-EAT-FISH
|
|||
01-10-2007, 06:34 PM,
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Doubles
Daren just got his 112's set up and ready for the water, now I just need to get back to cave country. Doubles are good!
In Life, You Either Do or You Don't. I Did! - (Wallace the Pit Bull 4/3/02-8/23/13)
|
|||
01-10-2007, 10:37 PM,
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Doubles
I agree, very reliable. 112's are great for a more open water, 85's for penetrating wrecks. Although, I can be mistaken.
Anyone else's thoughts on tank size on wreck penetrating? |
|||
01-10-2007, 11:42 PM,
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Doubles
Hey, I dont want to be a fly in the ointment. With all the talk about doubles.
Consider a RB. Just look at the options. The RB is just a tool. Check out SDT rebreather night. I think it is free. Call Bonnie. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)