Decompression Planning
|
02-26-2003, 11:13 AM,
|
|||
|
|||
Re:Decompression Planning
Depends on logistics - O2 is a lot easier to "mix" than EAN50, in terms of actual deco the two seam fairly similar with regards to diving profiles. With the EAN50 you do have the advantage of the 1.6 earlier on in the schedule, after which you can use the gradient to offgas. Also, if for some reason you have to cut deco short (weather, etc.), you probably have a much better chance getting out of the water without a type II hit if you had used the EAN50 - O2 should always be on board anyway.
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Decompression Planning - by beeger - 02-25-2003, 03:46 PM
Re:Decompression Planning - by DRE - 02-25-2003, 05:35 PM
Re:Decompression Planning - by beeger - 02-26-2003, 10:02 AM
Re:Decompression Planning - by DRE - 02-26-2003, 11:13 AM
Re:Decompression Planning - by davisj - 03-01-2003, 02:35 AM
Re:Decompression Planning - by tbrown - 03-01-2003, 05:43 AM
Re:Decompression Planning - by DRE - 03-01-2003, 09:48 AM
Re:Decompression Planning - by davisj - 03-02-2003, 09:33 AM
Re:Decompression Planning - by davisj - 03-02-2003, 09:34 AM
Re:Decompression Planning - by DRE - 03-02-2003, 01:54 PM
Re:Decompression Planning - by tbrown - 03-03-2003, 12:16 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)