|
Lake Calhoun contamination Identified
|
|
04-09-2010, 07:36 AM,
(This post was last modified: 04-09-2010, 07:43 AM by arcFlash.)
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Lake Calhoun contamination Identified
Anyone else wonder how they can say it posses no threat to health but they are investigating and preventing more runoff? There is no need to control 'harmless' runoff.
I ran this by a hydrologist friend and he said the real problem with PFOx is we don't have enough long term data to know if it's safe or not and the EPA says it is until they know more. But they are in the family of PFC and that's not good.
Ask your doctor if getting off your ass is right for you.
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Lake Calhoun contamination Identified - by scubadog76 - 04-08-2010, 07:10 PM
Re: Lake Calhoun contamination Identified - by popolarbear - 05-19-2010, 03:31 PM
Re: Lake Calhoun contamination Identified - by grumpie - 04-08-2010, 07:50 PM
Re: Lake Calhoun contamination Identified - by DiverQueen - 04-08-2010, 08:06 PM
Re: Lake Calhoun contamination Identified - by arcFlash - 04-09-2010, 07:36 AM
Re: Lake Calhoun contamination Identified - by mattd - 04-09-2010, 11:49 AM
Re: Lake Calhoun contamination Identified - by arcFlash - 04-09-2010, 01:12 PM
Re: Lake Calhoun contamination Identified - by doug67 - 04-09-2010, 05:48 PM
Re: Lake Calhoun contamination Identified - by Terry - 04-09-2010, 06:14 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)