Remember me
Lost Password Register


Potential trouble for Ore B gone
04-30-2007, 11:26 AM,
#13
Re: Potential trouble for Ore B gone

My worry is that the water movement will affect visibility.  we know that there are some areas of OBG that suffer worse vis than others, and there could be some mixing of this water with the clearer areas as the lake level continues to drop, or the disturbance of bottom sediment caused by the "reclaimed" water being re-introduced into the lake. 

I don't suppose that anyone (nerdy individuals such as myself, DNR, interested others) has secchi disk () data?  Maybe we could start.  I think that OBG brings money into Gilbert's coffers so if we could present some information that might suggest this activity would cause divers to travel and spend elsewhere perhaps we could help preserve a cool diving site.

Hopefully, vis won't be affected and the trees won't start poking through the surface anytime soon!

May all your dives be as warm and clear as the pool you learned to dive in!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Potential trouble for Ore B gone - by wtdrm - 04-25-2007, 07:18 PM
Re: Potential trouble for Ore B gone - by LKunze - 04-25-2007, 07:23 PM
Re: Potential trouble for Ore B gone - by LKunze - 04-25-2007, 08:38 PM
Re: Potential trouble for Ore B gone - by Maka - 04-26-2007, 06:55 AM
Re: Potential trouble for Ore B gone - by innerspace - 04-30-2007, 11:26 AM
Re: Potential trouble for Ore B gone - by LKunze - 04-30-2007, 01:55 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)