Invention or hoax?
|
06-07-2005, 08:44 AM,
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Invention or hoax?
Nitrogen wouldn't be extracted, water is the source not compressed air. Other inert gases are breathable, but its highly unlikely that a container of O2 and Hydrogen separation would be stable. Think you have some extra steps setting up a rebreather, just imagine this thing going into the water.
Hydroflourocarbons are difficult to breathe enough as it is and they are far more realistic. This is a Total Hoax! By the way, Dumbo now has a patent on his ears for flying, soon everyone will want one... in theory that is |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Invention or hoax? - by jasondbaker - 06-06-2005, 01:10 PM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by lrmoll - 06-06-2005, 04:25 PM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by DiveCaptDean - 06-06-2005, 07:06 PM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by CCRDIVER - 06-07-2005, 08:20 AM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by Dirk Diggler - 06-07-2005, 08:44 AM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by DanL - 06-07-2005, 02:37 PM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by ranger979 - 06-08-2005, 01:21 PM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by eric myers 2 - 06-08-2005, 02:07 PM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by ranger979 - 06-09-2005, 07:00 AM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by ranger979 - 06-09-2005, 07:13 AM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by billatlake - 06-09-2005, 07:19 PM
Re: Invention or hoax? - by ranger979 - 06-09-2005, 09:07 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)